15 Minutes of Math = $120K

by admin

A recent Reddit contributor (wisely) asked the “Bogleheads” forum for investing help. His full question is below. The question highlights are:

  • My 401(k) offers me a 2% match. 2% is not great compared to the industry average of 4-5%.
  • My 401(k) also has funds with 1% expense ratios (a.k.a. fees). Super high! Yuck!
  • This combination—poor employer matching and high fees—makes me want to say, “Screw the 401(k). I’d rather invest in a taxable account.”
  • But, I haven’t done the math to backup my gut instinct.

Here’s the full text, if you’re interested:

I recently got my hands on my employer’s 401(k) fund options. They are abysmal. The lowest expense ratio is just about 1%. My employer also gives a 2% match (0.25% of 8% contributed though).

So, the general advice is to contribute up to employer match, but even that I feel like it is not worth the expense ratio.

My argument for saying it is not worth it is related to the compounding effect of 1% exp ratio on the total amount invested vs. only 2% being matched each year. Over time, if I stay in this fund, I will lose much more from the expense ratio than I will gain from employer matching.

Even considering the advantages of the tax-deferred space, I have not done the calculations, but long term, I am pretty sure investing in a taxable account would be better than the 401k with 1% exp ratios.

Full forum post

Let’s quickly highlight some points about this question.

The Good, Bad, and Ugly About This Question

Open questions about money lead to important lessons. This is a great question to ask!

But we can learn two quick lessons from the “bad/ugly” aspects of this question.

  1. First, we have to separate what “feels bad” from what “is bad.” It might feel bad to pay a higher expense ratio than standard. And it might feel bad to have a low employer match. But the math of the problem holds true irrespective of feelings.**
  2. “I have not done the calculations, but long term, I am pretty sure…” Whoa, Nelly! This is a dangerous statement in personal finance. If you don’t know the calculations, that’s ok! Ask for help. The Internet is an amazing resource. But to be “pretty sure” about a mathematical outcome without doing any math—that’s unwise.

**Charlie Munger tells a story of when Berkshire Hathaway bought BNSF Railroad. Some Berkshire Hathways shareholders felt that they were only getting a “good” deal, while the BNSF shareholders were getting a “great” deal on the transaction. They wanted Berkshire’s leadership (Warren Buffett and Munger) to negotiate a better deal. And Charlie Munger wisely pointed out, “If you’re getting a good deal, why the hell do you care what the other guy is getting?” Envy is a potent drug.

The Math

To get a real answer, you’ve got to do real math. So that’s what I did.

Remember, the curious Redditor believed that a 401(k) would surely do worse than a taxable account. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.

I used conservative assumptions for my hypothetical 401(k) investor and compartively kind assumptions for my hypothetical taxable investor. I wanted to be extra gracious to the Redditor’s theory—could his gut be correct?

The assumptions and the math can all be found in this Google Spreadsheet.

  • Both investors contribute the same amount.
  • The 401(k) investor receives a 2% company match, but pays a 1% expense ratio.
  • The taxable investor pays income tax up front, receives no match, but pays no expense ratio.
  • Both investors see the same investment performance (before fees)
  • Both investors pay taxes upon withdrawal (30 years), though I assume a 22% income tax rate for the 401(k) investor and only a 10% capital gains rate for the taxable account investor.

Even with my harsh assumptions, the 401(k) investor outperforms the taxable investor by $120,000 (or about 12%) over a 30-year period.

That’s a huge amount. The 2% company match and tax-deferred nature of the 401(k) is significant.

Not to rub salt in the wound, but recall that this person was “fairly certain” that a taxable account was the smarter choice.

Lesson: always question your assumptions, especially if math can help you. I guarantee you know someone who can build this spreadsheet in 15 minutes or less. That’s little time, but much gained.

 

—

Previously Published on bestinterest.blog

 

—

Shutterstock

The post 15 Minutes of Math = $120K appeared first on The Good Men Project.

Back to Feed